While I think the government's job is solely to protect its citizens, I think it might be better to be less hands-on with airport security. Ease the restrictions and let people with concealed carry permits (or maybe special airplane versions with smaller, less penetrating bullets or something) protect themselves and their comrades. Or, maybe let each airline determine it's own security procedures? I don't know what the right answer is, I'll admit, but I'm pretty sure it isn't what we've got.
6 comments:
Finely our tax dollars at work. I always thought 6 year old's were the problem with air travel. Next newborns!!!!!
Ron Paul is looking better all the time.
No doubt about Ron Paul. His son Rand might be even better. Then Gary Johnson as VP. Heck, I'd take any of them in any order.
Todd, I've traveled with a newborn. It's true, you never know what you'll find in their diaper!
While I think the government's job is solely to protect its citizens, I think it might be better to be less hands-on with airport security. Ease the restrictions and let people with concealed carry permits (or maybe special airplane versions with smaller, less penetrating bullets or something) protect themselves and their comrades. Or, maybe let each airline determine it's own security procedures? I don't know what the right answer is, I'll admit, but I'm pretty sure it isn't what we've got.
http://libertysrest.blogspot.com/
I'm pretty sure you are correct. Violating the rights of our own citizens is surely the wrong approach.
Perhaps we should study the tactics of Israel, they have had more success than any other country. And they are under greater threat.
Thanks for the comment and the link from your blog.
Post a Comment